|
Friday, October 5,
2007
"...Follow me and I will make you fishers of men."
Matthew 4:19
- Message from
Bishop-elect David C. Anderson
- Joint
Standing Committee Report on New Orleans
- Observations
of Archbishop Mouneer Anis on the H.O.B.
- Presiding
U.S. Episcopal Bishop: "We're not going backward"
- Christ
Church, Savannah Leaves TEC
Message from
Bishop-elect David C. Anderson
When a Father Betrays the Family, All Suffer
This cannot be said in a
few words. What is really going on in the Anglican Communion? Is
there more going on than meets the eye? The answer is shocking and
disappointing. A number of events are coming together to change the
fundamental character of the Communion and re-establish the hegemony
of the spiritually revisionist West.
Why has Rowan Williams overlooked the facts given him and welcomed
the Episcopal Church to Lambeth anyway? The AAC provided Archbishop
Williams with comprehensive documentation of the Episcopal Church's
words and actions relating to compliance with Dar es Salaam, usually
in their own words, in direct quotes, with sources footnoted and
internet weblinks. Did he bother to read it? Some pundits and
commentators expected the Archbishop of Canterbury to actually
review the facts, weigh the facts fairly and accurately, and
properly discipline the current official branch of American
Anglicanism, TEC.
Williams not only came to New Orleans with a closed mind to the
provable facts, he came with a plan to swiftly undercut the orthodox
Global South and those orthodox Americans whom they have supported.
Within days, the optimistic pundits and commentators who thought
that Dr. Williams cared about the morality and integrity of the
Communion, cared about the Windsor Report, cared about the
Dromantine and Dar es Salaam Communiques, were shown to be mistaken.
What Dr. Williams cares about is holding onto American financial
support, holding onto the revisionist provinces of England, Ireland,
Wales and Scotland, and allowing the pantheistic and homosexual
agendas to continue their unfolding and flourishing.
Dr. Williams took two important actions upon leaving New Orleans:
launching the Joint Standing Committee Report (very likely written
before New Orleans by the Rev. Canon Dr. Gregory Cameron of the
Anglican Communion Office); and immediately commencing a telephone
campaign, phoning Anglican Primates to ask (read convince or coerce)
their agreement that the Episcopal Church had substantially met the
standards of the Dar es Salaam Communique.
With ears carefully turned to Lambeth, we find that Rowan Williams
is determined that Lambeth 2008 will absolutely take place, and on
his terms.
The AAC has been advised from trustworthy sources that Dr. Williams
is already obligated for Lambeth Conference costs in Canterbury next
summer, which means that if he cancels it, he is still responsible
for most of the costs of the conference anyway. In order to secure
their booking for the University of Kent, which is the venue for the
Lambeth Conference of Bishops, one deposit of £440,000 (about
$880,000 USD) was due on October 1, with a second payment for the
same amount due on December 1. Did he receive the amount of money
needed for the first payment in time to meet the October 1 deadline?
Was this why his actions to secure a blessing for TEC were so
frantic?
Perhaps he already had the down payment in hand for the October 1
installment, but he knows that the next deadline is December 1 when
he will need another £440,000 (or $880,000 USD). Where will he
acquire such enormous funds? If TEC is neither invited to Lambeth
nor given a passing grade, the Lambeth Conference would be in as
much trouble financially as a well known bank in the UK which had to
be suddenly rescued. Who will rescue Lambeth and Rowan Williams?
Would TEC put the envelope in the mail if they were treated
favorably? The New Orleans Statement pressed for an invitation to
Lambeth for Bishop Gene Robinson and offered to help the Archbishop
of Canterbury achieve that. What might this help be? Stressors and
motivations like these, though unseen by the public, are constant
factors in the relationship between Canterbury and TEC. Sadly, that
relationship is determining the direction and focus of a 77 million
member church.
His Grace, the Archbishop of Canterbury, contacted the Primates
quietly and individually, ostensibly to gather their views on
whether TEC had passed the test. It is imperative to Dr. Williams
that a substantial number of the Primates, no matter how small their
province, agree that TEC has at least tried hard enough for a
further chance. Dromantine and Dar es Salaam were unanimous, and he
knows his best chance is to keep the Primates separated and unable
to confer together in a meeting. We note that several members of the
Joint Standing Committee did not attach their names in agreement to
the railroaded text, and the AAC applauds the Most Rev. Dr. Mouneer
Hanna Anis (President Bishop of the Province of Jerusalem and the
Middle East and a member of the Primates Standing Committee) for his
courageous and accurate minority opinion to the JSC report, as well
as his cogent observations based on his experience in New Orleans.
Let's watch the news carefully over the next eight weeks. Will Dr.
Williams coerce a slight majority of Primates to agree
favorably towards TEC? Will Dr. Williams find the £440,000 for the
next installment due December 1 and save both face and the Lambeth
Conference - at least until the next installment is due? Follow the
money and watch for updates as answers to these questions become
available. Watch for the official announcement from Dr. Williams
that TEC is OK, and then later, that Gene Robinson is coming to
Lambeth. Am I wrong on this analysis? I believe I am spot on, but I
am willing to issue a challenge to Lambeth Palace: prove me wrong.
The Williams/Jefferts Schori theory for pacification of the Anglican
troubles bears some comparison with France during the Occupation.
During the Second World War, French leaders who wanted to "save"
France from further German destruction used well-meaning and even
heroic figures to form the Vichy government. Although it may have
saved Paris from destruction, it wound up sending most of France's
Jews to the death camps. According to the Jefferts Schori plan,
which is a major downgrading of the Dar es Salaam plan, a few
American orthodox bishops would agree to partner with Presiding
Bishop Jefferts Schori and her Vichy-style accommodation, and all
the churches which have left TEC would be forced back into TEC under
their pastoral care. I do not believe that any parish, vestry
member, clergy or diocese that has been personally sued by TEC, had
their health insurance jerked out from under them, had their
property confiscated, their pensions lost or frozen, and publicly
deposed when they had already announced they had left, would ever
forget why they left and why they can not go back. The current
Episcopal Church cannot and will not repent. The AAC would caution
any orthodox TEC bishops who might consider such an arrangement that
they would be putting themselves on the wrong side of history. Such
a plan will fail because the parishes which have left TEC will not
go back to TEC, not even to a collaborationist accommodation. If
forced hard enough they will leave Canterbury Anglicanism, but they
will not go back. Does Rowan Williams not care?
One can easily imagine a divided Anglicanism with the revisionist
provinces centered upon Dr. Williams and Canterbury, complete with
those who are pantheistic and support the pro-homosexual agenda, as
well as those who just want to linger on the sidelines and benefit
from the financial bread that falls from the table. The other side
of a divided Anglicanism might be the orthodox Anglicans from all
over the world, based in the Global South, free from both Canterbury
and York, and looking to the Christian essentials of what
Anglicanism is really about.
Elsewhere in the Communion, Christ Church in Savannah, Georgia (USA)
has announced they have left the Episcopal Diocese of Georgia and
TEC. This parish is known as the Mother Church of Georgia because it
is the first Christian Church in what was then the new English
colony of Georgia, founded in 1733. They predate the state of
Georgia, the Diocese of Georgia and the Episcopal Church itself, and
they are resolutely orthodox. Their former bishop, Henry Louttit,
has already begun the official Episcopal Church mantra, "Individuals
can leave TEC but parishes and diocese can't leave." Since the new
rules out of Episcopal Church headquarters insist on no negotiation
over property, there will undoubtedly be a legal attack leveled
against the faithful congregation of Christ Church. Pray for them.
An interesting exception to the "no negotiation" rule is that if a
church leaves and agrees NOT to affiliate with any other Anglican
entity, and does not CLAIM to be Anglican, we are told that
negotiation is then possible. This is about more than property; this
is TEC trying to protect their formerly exclusive franchise of being
the only authentically Anglican province in the USA.
One instance of a revisionist TEC diocese trying to be honorable and
charitable with congregations departing TEC was Olympia and former
bishop Warner. A new bishop has just been elected and installed, and
now all agreements, even those in "dry ink" are to be looked over.
At its annual convention this year, the Diocese of Olympia will take
up resolutions reconfirming its trust ownership of all property on
behalf of "This Church" (Title 1.7.4), ask its leaders to examine
all congregational titles for canonical compliance, and begin the
process of recovering "alienated property" in Oak Harbor and
Poulsbo. And this is TEC Anglicanism!!
Not only orthodox Anglicanism, but the Christian faith itself is
under attack from those who would reshape it to be something
completely different, something of the world and not of God. Let us
stand together to preach and live the true faith of the Christian
Gospel.
Blessings and Peace in
Christ Jesus,
Bishop-elect David C. Anderson
President & CEO of the AAC
Joint Standing
Committee Report on New Orleans
Source:
Church Times
Date: October 3, 2007
The Joint Standing Committee of the Primates and of the Anglican
Consultative Council (JSC) has signaled its approval of the
statement released by the US House of Bishops last week.
In a 19-page assessment,
published on Wednesday, the committee concludes that the Bishops
"have met the requirements of the Windsor report...and the request
of the Primates at Dar es Salaam" for a moratorium on public rites
for the blessing of same-sex unions; and has "given the necessary
assurances" on the subject of consecrating gay bishops...
Read the rest of the
article by clicking
here.
Read the JSC's report by
clicking
here.
Note: Two of the
thirteen members on the Joint Standing Committee have not responded
to the report; another committee member, President Bishop of
Jerusalem and the Middle East, Mouneer Anis, disagreed with the
report and did not support it.
Observations of
Archbishop Mouneer Anis on the H.O.B.
Source:
Anglican Mainstream
Date: October 4, 2007
During the HOB meetings I observed the following:
Membership in the
Anglican Communion
The majority of Bishops
are keen to maintain their membership with in the Anglican
Communion. "We need the Anglican Communion, and the Anglican
Communion needs us". Some Bishops also expressed their appreciation
of the companionship relations and mission work between TEC Dioceses
and other Dioceses within the Anglican Communion.
Values of
significance within TEC
Ensuring social justice
for all members of the society. This would be expressed by the full
participation of practicing homosexuals of all aspects of the
ministry of the church, including ordained ministry. This also
guarantees that gay and lesbian couple have their unions blessed in
the church.
Alleviating poverty
through implementing the UN Millennium Development Goals (MDG).
Autonomy. While they
value their membership within the Anglican Communion, they are
absolutely clear that TEC is an autonomous church and should not
receive instruction from any other body or church, like the Primates
Meeting.
Inclusiveness. The
American Bishops spoke about inclusiveness as an utmost necessity
within church life. Everybody, regardless of life style or sexual
orientation or belief should enjoy full participation in church
life. Though they stress this value, the orthodox Bishops within
TEC feel marginalized and excluded.
TEC adopted a
different direction from the Anglican Communion
The issue of
homosexuality and the blessing of same-sex marriages is just a tiny
part of the direction that TEC is moving in. Their views of the
scriptures, salvation and Jesus Christ, His divinity and uniqueness,
are very different from the majority views of the Anglican
Communion. They strongly believe that this new direction is
prophetic and will lead to reformation within the Church. For this
reason they cannot wait for the rest of the Communion because they
are taking the lead towards this new direction. Several bishops are
very critical of the idea of a Covenant; this is why it was not
mentioned in their response to the Primates. The Archbishop of
Canterbury graciously addressed the House of Bishops and shared that
he believed that the heart of the issue is about the understanding
of ecclesiology and Catholicity. He also shared with them that it
is a Bishop's responsibility to serve the common discernment of the
whole Church. It was surprising for me to observe the angry
response of several Bishops to these remarks. Perhaps this is
because the Archbishop of Canterbury pointed out the very reason for
the crisis we are in. This reason is the spirit of individualism
within the American Church. Such individualism is manifested by
their disregard for the rest of the Communion and ecumenical
partners.
Resolution B033 of the
General Convention in 2006 states that they will "exercise restraint
by not consenting to the consecration of any candidate to the
episcopate whose manner of life presents a challenge to the wider
church and will lead to further strains on the Communion", (which
they clarified to include non-celibate homosexuals). In spite of
this, Gene Robinson is welcomed and supported by the HOB. It is a
source of pride for the majority of bishops that they were able to
go ahead of all the churches and consecrate a bishop who is an
active gay. Moreover they asked the Archbishop of Canterbury to
find a way for Gene Robinson to participate at Lambeth 2008. This
clearly expresses their determination to continue to travel in this
new direction'.
Outside
Intervention within TEC
The House of Bishops
expressed their rejection of the interventions by Primates from
other Provinces. However they did not accept the Primates
recommendation of a Pastoral Scheme. Instead they came up with an
internal plan for "Episcopal visitors" which is unlikely to solve
deep disputes between Dioceses and parishes and TEC. Of course it
is impossible to imagine that TEC could both be a party in the
dispute as well as a judge of it.
Conclusion
In conclusion, I believe
that TEC did not and will not change its position in regard to the
issues that tear apart the fabric of the Communion. They tried to
use very ambiguous language to show that they responded positively
to the Windsor Report and well as the Primates recommendation.
However, I see that they are determined to go their own way. I am
afraid that TEC's position may lead to more intervention and further
fragmentation within the Communion. They describe their position as
a new Reformation, but they forgot that the reformation led to a
split!
At a time like this we
need clarity and firmness to resolve this crisis. Without this the
Communion will fragment because every church will take the actions
she likes. I do pray for Archbishop Rowan Williams at this time, so
that the Lord may give him wisdom and the love in this difficult
time.
Read Archbishop Anis'
response to the Joint Standing Committee's report on the Episcopal
Church's House of Bishops' recent statement by clicking
here.
Read the The Primate of Uganda's response by clicking
here.
Presiding U.S.
Episcopal Bishop: "We're not going backward"
Source:
SFGate
Date: October 1, 2007
On Sunday - the deadline
set by church leaders for the Episcopal Church to roll back support
for same-sex unions - the U.S. church's presiding bishop said
unequivocally at San Francisco's Grace Cathedral that there would be
no retreat.
"All people - including
gay and lesbian Christians and non-Christians - are deserving of the
fullest regard of the church," the Most Rev. Katharine Jefferts
Schori declared during an hourlong discussion before services.
"We're not going backward."
Jefferts Schori said
these are the views of the church's bishops as well as its lay
members - who have increasingly affirmed rights for same-sex
couples. As such, Jefferts Schori's comments served as the
punctuation to a historic day...
Read the rest of the
article by clicking
here.
Christ Church,
Savannah Leaves TEC
Source:
Christ Church Savannah
Date: October 2, 2007
The vestry of historic
Christ Church in Savannah, Georgia has voted to leave the Episcopal
Church and affiliate with the province of Uganda. Read the press
release by clicking
here.
|