|
Friday,
February 9, 2007
|
"Preach
the Word; be prepared in season and out of season; correct, rebuke
and encourage - with patience and careful instruction. For the time
will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine... But you,
keep your head in all situations, endure hardship, do the work of an
evangelist, discharge all the duties of your ministry."
(2 Timothy 4:2-3a,5) |
-
Call to Prayer for the Primates' Meeting
-
AAC President Comments on Recent Actions by Diocese
and Bishop of Virginia
-
Episcopal Parish in the Diocese of Atlanta Departs
Episcopal Church, Joins CANA
- Primates Head Into a Storm in Dar es Salaam (Church
Times)
- Perspectives on Next Week's Primates' Meeting:
Archbishop Gomez & Bishop Wright
CALL TO
PRAYER FOR THE PRIMATES' MEETING
The Primates, or leaders, of
the 38 provinces of the Anglican Communion will gather next week in Dar
Es Salaam, Tanzania. According to Archbishop Drexel Gomez (Primate of
the West Indies), six topics will dominate the meeting's agenda (as
published in a recent Bahama
Journal article):
1. The response of the
Episcopal Church in The United States to the Windsor Report
2. The ongoing relationship between the Episcopal Church and the
worldwide Anglican Communion
3. An Anglican Covenant
4. The Lambeth Conference 2008
5. Theological education in the Anglican Communion
6. Ecumenical relations
The American Anglican Council
(AAC) will offer regular online coverage of the meeting, primarily
through our BLOG
and Web site.
In addition, we will send e-mail updates regarding important
developments at the meeting when they occur.
Please join the AAC in praying
for the Primates as they gather Monday, Feb. 12 through Monday, Feb. 19
(the meeting officially begins on Feb. 14, but many are assembling early
for pre-meetings). Pray for their physical and spiritual safety and for
their decisions and discussions to be informed by God's wisdom and
guidance.
AAC
PRESIDENT COMMENTS ON RECENT ACTIONS BY THE DIOCESE AND BISHOP OF
VIRGINIA AGAINST 11 ANGLICAN CONGREGATIONS AND 21 PRIESTS
American Anglican Council
Press Release
February 8, 2007
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Jenny Abel
770-414-1515
Last week, the bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Virginia, the Rt. Rev.
Peter Lee, filed civil litigation against 11 Virginia congregations that
recently departed the diocese and joined the Convocation of Anglicans in
North America (CANA). Bishop Lee also inhibited 21 priests associated
with the churches under the charge of “abandonment of Communion.” The 11
parishes, which have repeatedly emphasized their desire and willingness
to meet the bishop and diocesan leaders at the negotiation table rather
than in court, called the legal action by the diocese an “act of
betrayal” and has requested that the diocese “step back from this
precipitous behavior” so that an “amicable and reasonable” resolution
may be pursued.
“These actions by the Diocese
of Virginia are shameful and un-Christian, and the bishop’s refusal to
consider further negotiation appears to be intentionally punitive,” said
the Rev. Canon David C. Anderson, American Anglican Council (AAC)
President and CEO. “After leading the churches to believe that their
disaffiliation decisions would be respected and responded to with
Christian charity and without litigation, the bishop and other diocesan
officials have indeed betrayed and deceived these churches, plus
attempted to shipwreck the ordained ministry of many faithful priests.”
Last fall, before the churches
voted to leave the diocese and The Episcopal Church (TEC), their leaders
worked together with the diocese to establish a common protocol
specifying procedures for disaffiliation and subsequent property
negotiation. This protocol, developed under Bishop Lee’s oversight, was
received by the Standing Committee, and the churches followed it
closely. In particular, the protocol stated that if a church voted by at
least a 70 percent majority to retain its property, then a payment for
the property by the departing church to the diocese would be determined
by agreement between representatives of the church and diocese. In
addition, the protocol said, “In approaching their agreement, we urge
the parties to be guided by principles of fairness, equity and Christian
charity.”
Despite this and other earlier
indications of willingness for mutual cooperation, the bishop and
Diocese of Virginia have sadly chosen to take a similar path to that of
some other Episcopal bishops across the country when confronted with
Episcopal congregations leaving their dioceses. Bishop Lee, in a Jan.
18, 2007 letter to his diocese, emphasized that he did not believe the
move to seize the churches’ properties through litigation to be
dishonorable, but rather “consistent with our mission and with our
fiduciary and moral obligations to the Church.”
Canon Anderson responded:
“Since when is litigation the only or even the preferred way of
Christians resolving disputes over mission, fiduciary or moral
obligations? Does not Matthew 18 set out a path of resolution and
negotiation? Since these are two international organizations that are in
dispute, the resolution needs to be decided by an international Anglican
body, such as the Primates.”
Continuing, Canon Anderson
said: “Unfortunately, I am not surprised by the turn for the worse in
Virginia, though it grieves me deeply. Virginia is one diocese of many
where the top leadership of The Episcopal Church is accelerating the
promotion of its agenda to punish those who choose not to remain
institutionally loyal and instead affiliate with orthodox bishops
overseas. This is a trend that began several years ago and is now in
full force as the national Episcopal Church attempts to fight its
continued membership decline, plus faces opposition abroad that could
result in the church’s expulsion from the Anglican Communion.
“Ironically, these kinds of
desperate attempts to gain control of individual churches’ assets not
only constitutes unbiblical behavior, but also reinforces the very
reasons that the churches left the Episcopal Church to begin with,
namely abandonment of Scriptural authority and the historic mission of
the Church,” Canon Anderson said.
The AAC continues to offer its
full support for these 11 churches in Virginia, as well as other
parishes that have departed TEC.
“The Scriptures promise that
those who remain faithful to Jesus Christ and His Word will ultimately
prevail,” Canon Anderson concluded. “I applaud these churches’ costly
faithfulness and encourage other orthodox Episcopalians and Anglicans to
follow their example in standing up for the Gospel of Jesus Christ in
whatever venue they find themselves, even in the face of opposition.”
ST.
ANDREW'S-IN-THE-PINES (PEACHTREE CITY, GA.) TO DISAFFILIATE FROM THE
EPISCOPAL CHURCH AND THE DIOCESE OF ATLANTA
St.
Andrew's-in-the-Pines, Peachtree City, Press Release
February 8, 2007
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact:
David Wardell
404-277-6752
The downward spiral of The
Episcopal Church (TEC) came home to Peachtree City, Ga., this past
weekend when a local parish, St. Andrew’s-in-the-Pines, voted 145 to 67
(or 68 percent) on Sunday, Feb. 4 to separate from the national church
and the Episcopal Diocese of Atlanta. The church’s vestry, or governing
board, subsequently voted to honor the parish’s overwhelming desire to
depart from TEC. The vestry also voted to join the Convocation of
Anglicans in North America (CANA) – the U.S. missionary branch of the
Anglican Church of Nigeria – in order to maintain the parish’s ties to
the worldwide Anglican Communion.
“We simply want to continue to
worship Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior in the way that we always have,”
one church member said after Sunday’s vote. “The vast majority of us
still have faith that Jesus Christ is the Way, the Truth and the Life,
and that Jesus is the one true Son of God, born of a virgin, crucified
until dead, and then resurrected to life. All of that is contrary to
what a majority of TEC leadership believes. The authority of Scripture
and the issue of Jesus as THE Savior are important to us.”
St. Andrew’s Senior Warden
David Wardell said the parish – which intends to retain its property –
plans to work with the Diocese of Atlanta to achieve an amicable
separation.
“Our decision to disaffiliate
is a reflection of our commitment to the biblical faith, which is now in
direct contrast with the belief and practice of the majority of TEC’s
leadership,” Wardell said. “However, the vestry has a strong willingness
to work together with the diocese and Bishop Alexander so that this
separation can occur with Christian charity, not hard feelings or
hostility.”
The Episcopal Bishop of
Atlanta, the Rt. Rev. Neil Alexander, tried to short-circuit the
church’s internal voting process last week by sending a letter to all
parishioners that was clearly intended to disrupt the church’s efforts
and sway or prevent the vote. The letter attempted to discredit the
church’s plan for a fair and impartial decision by stating that the vote
would have “no official standing.” Bishop Alexander, who is well known
for his embrace of theological revisionism, also threatened to remove
the entire church vestry and replace it with a group that he would
hand-pick.
St. Andrew’s joins
approximately 250 other Episcopal churches that have split from TEC
since 2003 for similar reasons. More than two dozen of those churches
have also joined CANA, which is experiencing rapid growth and emerging
as a forerunner in the realignment of North American Anglicanism.
Founded in 1975, St. Andrew’s
has a current membership of 350 and is presently without a permanent
priest since the recent retirement of Father Dan Brigham. The parish has
a predominantly orthodox membership, unlike TEC, which has been pursuing
a course of increasingly radical theological revisionism for over four
decades, during which time the church has lost approximately 40 percent
of its membership. Like St. Andrew’s, a majority of the Anglican
Communion’s other 37 provinces remain at odds with the direction and top
leadership of TEC, which faces the possibility of being disciplined at
the upcoming Primates’ Meeting, to be held next week in Tanzania.
CHURCH
TIMES: PRIMATES HEAD INTO A STORM IN DAR ES SALAAM
Source: Church
Times
by Rachel Harden
Issue 7509 - 9 February, 2007
PRIMATES from the Global South
and the new US Presiding Bishop, Dr Katharine Jefferts Schori, have
confirmed their intention to attend next week’s Primates’ Meeting in
Tanzania despite reports of disharmony, it was announced on Tuesday.
Speaking from Tanzania, an
Anglican Communion spokesman, Jim Rosenthal, said that the only two
Primates who have sent apologies were the Archbishop of Wales, who is on
sabbatical, and the Moderator of the Church of North India, who had
given notice earlier. All the other Primates had registered, he said.
The meeting runs next week,
from 14-19 February, and takes place at the Jangwani Beach near Dar es
Salaam. It will be chaired by the Archbishop of Canterbury. For the
first time, Dr Sentamu will attend to represent England. Although the
Archbishop of York is a Primate, the convention observed hitherto has
been that only one English representative attends.
He will be joined by another
newcomer, the Most Revd Paul Kwong, elected Archbishop of the Hong Kong
Province on Saturday. Archbishop Kwong, who succeeds the Most Revd Peter
Kwong, is aged 54, and has been a bishop only since 25 March 2006.
The Episcopal Church in the US
will be in the spotlight at the meeting. Two full sessions of the
Primates’ Meeting, as well as two external sessions with presentations
by US conservatives, will discuss the Episcopal Church and the Anglican
Communion.
A report on the Living Church
website suggests that Dr Schori is expected to face tough questioning,
and is likely to outline what steps the Episcopal Church has taken in
response to the Windsor Report.
Mr Rosenthal confirmed that
there would also be sessions on the “listening process” proposed by the
1998 Lambeth Conference, the proposed Anglican Covenant, and the
Archbishop of Canterbury’s Panel of Reference, established for those who
are unwilling to accept the direct oversight of their diocesan bishops.
At the weekend, reports
suggested that conservative Primates from the Global South were
continuing to refuse to sit at the same table as Dr Schori.
An article in The Daily
Telegraph suggested that Global South leaders had written to Dr Williams
warning him that he had no right to invite Dr Schori to the meeting.
The Primate of Nigeria, the
Most Revd Peter Akinola, was also reported as saying that Dr Williams
was not acting as a “first among equals”, and should have consulted the
others before inviting Dr Sentamu...
Continued here
PERSPECTIVES ON NEXT WEEK'S PRIMATES' MEETING
Archbishop Drexel Gomez (West Indies):
Extracted from Feb. 9, 2007 Bahama
Journal article
"This meeting is
one of the most important meetings that I would be attending during my
ministry because to a very large extent the future of the Anglican
Communion is dependent upon what we are able to accomplish."
Bishop Tom Wright
(Durham, Church of England):
Ruth Gledhill, The Times Online, February 6, 2007 (full
text here)
Interview by Ruth Gledhill:
"There are many in America who
are trying to have their cake and eat it, who are doing the schismatic
thing and then accusing those who object of being schismatic." This is
what Bishop of Durham Dr Tom Wright told me in a wide-ranging discussion
we had on the forthcoming Primates' Meeting in Tanzania. He was quite
unequivocal. He said too many in TEC are guilty of "doctrinal
indifferentism." The Covenant Design Group in Nassau successfully
produced a good document, he said. The Primates have little choice but
to follow Windsor at the meeting next week. And if Windsor is followed,
then Gene Robinson and those who consecrated him should voluntarily
absent themselves from the councils of the Communion, including the
Lambeth Conference, unless they express regret in the terms set out in
Windsor. Only a Windsor-rooted response in Tanzania can save the
Communion from schism. "Almost everybody involved with this question
recognizes that there is no way forward from here without pain. It is
painful for everybody. There are not going to be winners and losers.
There are going to be losers category one, two, three, four and five."
In reading his words, it is worth remembering that not only is he the
intellectual equal of the Archbishop of Canterbury, the two men are good
friends. So I reckon this gives us a good idea of how events might
unfold next week.
Tom Wright said: "For the last
three years, every meeting has looked like this is the make-or-beak one.
There is a bit of this now - yet one more time round the tracks.
However, the film is gradually unwinding and we are closing in on the
fact that something has got to happen soon. By the end of 2007 the
Archbishop of Canterbury will have had to send out invitations to the
Lambeth Conference. One way or another, the decisions he has to make in
relation to that are bound to have some kind of effect in various parts
of the Anglican Communion.
"That is a way of saying that
by this time next year, we will certainly not be where we are now. Some
lines will have hardened, one way or another. There is so much sound and
fury in many different directions that it is a matter of several
different pressures from several different corners - trying to hear
them and listen to the voice of God in the middle of it all and make
some sense of it..."
|